"is a series of typefaces designed by Steve Matteson" is incorrect, Segoe Script and Print were developed my Monotype Imaging after Steve left. Does the title Segoe UI make sense any more given the addition of information on non UI fonts that use the Segoe trademark? ( 24.19.11.107 ( talk) 15:43, 13 April 2008 (UTC)) Omnichad ( talk) 15:17, 15 October 2009 (UTC) Expansion to cover other Segoe fonts There is NO sense in using it as font-style in the HTML. If they want to show a preview of the font, someone with a font license can create a graphic version of the preview and just post the graphic. If you don't have the font then you'll see Arial. If you happen to have the font you either know what it looks like (because its used in UI) or you don't care, or you can view the font. This HTML relies on the font being installed. It seems strange that the HTML specification of the font and showing of a seemingly random subset of characters in these fonts is tolerated.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |